|
THE END OF THE WORLD (NOSTRADAMUS VERSUS ROUSSAT)
Preface to Cesar
...these predictions run from today until the year 3797 - maybe
some will frown their foreheads if they see this long time span... Epistle
to Henry II
...So, by this calculation I have
made, collected from the holy writings, there are about four
thousand one hundred seventy three years and eight months, more
or less... |
In
the first decades of the sixteenth century, numerous predictions about the approaching
end of the world circulated in France, Italy and the Holy Roman Empire. [1] Many astrologers tried to calculate the
date on which this would happen. There are calculations known, made by
contemporaries of Nostradamus such as d’Ailly, De Cuse, Turrel, Morin
and Lauret.[2]
In 1550, the French astrologer and canon Richard Roussat published Livre de l'estat et de
mutation des temps. By means of four astrological models, he
tried to demonstrate that the end of time was near:
The
first model
In
this model, the existence of the world is divided in four
periods of 1750 years.
Originally,
this model was described by amongst others Francois de Macedonne.
The periods are connected with the
cardinal signs of the Zodiac:
-
First period: Creation – Deluge: Aries. Rulers: Mars and the
Sun.
-
Second period:
Deluge – drowning of Pharaoh’s army during the Exodus:
Cancer. Rulers: the Moon and Jupiter.
-
Third period:
Exodus – Diaspora: Libra. Rulers: Venus and Saturn.
-
Fourth period: Diaspora – end of the world: Capricorn.
Rulers: Saturn and Mars.
The
second model
In this model, the existence of the world is divided in series
of seven periods of 354 years and 4 months, each period ruled by
a planet. The first period of 354 years and 4 months is ruled by
Saturn, the second by Venus, the third by Jupiter, the fourth by
Mercury, the fifth by Mars, the sixth by the Moon, the seventh
by the Sun. Then a new series of periods begins,of which the
first is ruled by Saturn, etc. Roussat took this model from Liber
Rationum, written
in the 12th century by Abraham Ibn Ezra.
The
third model
In this model, the existence of the world is divided in periods
of about 240 years. The time span of 240 years is based on the
change of astrological element (fire, earth, air, water) in
which the successive conjunctions of Jupiter and Saturn take
place. Roussat took this model from Libro
de magnis coniunctionibus, written in the 9th century by
the Arabian astrologer Albumasar (Abu Ma'Shar).
The
fourth model
In this model, the existence of the world is divided in periods
of about 300 years. The time span of 300 years is based on ten
rotations of Saturn. Roussat also took this model from Libro
de magnis coniunctionibus.
Roussat
dates the creation of the world in 5199, which is 5200 BC.This assumption is based on calculations by Eusebius of Cesarea, a 4th
century bishop, known as the “father of Church history”.[3]
Roussat
also presents a chart of the creation of the world. He does not mention
the date of the chart, the time or the altitude.[4]
 |
Richard
Roussat
LIVRE DE L'ESTAT ET MUTATION DES TEMPS.
ISBN 2.7144.1405.2
The
assumptions by Roussat
In
the first model, the number of years of existence of the world is 7.000.
The existence begins with the Creation, as described in Genesis.
According to Roussat, at the end of the 7.000 years the Last Judgment
will take place, as described in Revelations 20. This is shown by the
fact that he quotes the last line of the catholic Credo: et expecto
resurrectionem mortuorum, et vitam ventori saeculi.[5]
One
day in the seventh millennium, all the planets will reach the point from
which they started moving at the time of the Creation. Then the moving
stops, i.e. the world will come to an end.[6]
Each
period of 1750 years is ruled by the planet which rules the involved
cardinal sign, and the planet which is in exaltation in that sign.
Saturn and Mars rule the fourth period of 1750 years. Because both these
planets are malefics, Roussat expects the Antichrist to come in this
period.[7]
Roussat does not give a precise date on which the world will end.
He mentions the years around 1789, because a big, splendid conjunction
will occur, together with the fulfilment of a ten-rotation cycle of
Saturn. The period around 1814 is another possibility, because according
to Roussat the fourth period of 1750 years will end around that year.
Roussat adds that only God knows the duration of existence of the world.[8]
Both years match with his statement that the end of the world is near,
i.e. close to his lifetime.[9]
Roussat
finished his book in 1549. According to the second model, this is in
the period of 354 years and 4 months which is ruled by the Moon and runs
from 1533 until 1887. The next period (1887 – 2242) is ruled by the
Sun. Next, there is a period, ruled by Saturn, provided, Roussat writes,
that around that time the world still exists.[10] Again,
he does not give the date of the end of the world. It is possible that
he assumes that there will be three complete series of seven periods of
354 years and 4 months and that Saturn will not begin a fourth series.
This could mean that the world will end in 2242. Roussat does not
discuss this at all.
Another
feature of the approach of Roussat is that none of the four models is
based upon a progression system. The predictions of Roussat are based on
two transit cycles (actual zodiacal longitudes of planets which occur around the time of
fulfilment) and two systems of periods (the fourfold series of 1750
years and the series of periods of 354 years and 4 months).
Evaluation
Roussat
presents four models in order to prove his point, mentioned in the
subtitle of Livre de l'estat...: Prouuant par authoriteZ de l’Escripture
Saincte, &
par raisons astrologales, la fin du Monde estre prochaine. It looks
as if he expects the end of the world in 1789 or 1814. But only the year
1789 matches with the time span of 7.000 years, covered by the model of De
Macedonne.
In terms of “Anno Mundi”, the year 1789 is the
6988th year. The year 1814 is off, because this year is the
7013th year. It is also possible that Roussat counts with
three complete series of seven periods of 354 years and 4 months, which
means that the world will end in 2241, but this does not match with his
statement that the end of the world is close to his lifetime.
Roussat
might have reservations mentioning the date on which the world will end,
because in the fifth Lateran council (1512) it
was forbidden for clergymen to mention data regarding the coming of the
Antichrist or the end of the world. He might also have reservations
because, according to Matthew 24,36, only God knows about this. In that case, however,
the attempt of Roussat to
prove his point by means of astrology is superfluous.
The
four models do not point to the same year. If the four periods of 1750
years cannot be exceeded, the world was supposed to end on probably
April 9, 1801, Gregorian calendar.[11]
On January 1, 1801,
Saturn retrograde was located on 23 Leo, i.e. not on 21 Aquarius, his
position in the chart of the creation of the world from which he started
to rotate. In 1801, Saturn was only halfway his rotation, which means he
does not complete a series of ten. On January 1, 1801, Jupiter
retrograde was located on 2 Leo. A conjunction with Saturn did not occur
in 1801, but on July 17, 1802, on the 6th degree of Virgo.
This was indeed a change of element; the conjunctions of 1742, 1762 and
1782 took place in fire signs. But the conjunction in Virgo took place
after the end of the first model. As for the periods of 354 years and 4
months, 1801 was ruled by the Moon, but replacement of rulership by the
Sun would occur much later, in 1887. There is no connection between the
third model and the first model, i.e. there is no trigger in the first
model that puts the third model to an end or vice versa. And the
question is if Ibn Ezra has stated that the world will exists during
three complete series of seven periods of 354 years and 4 months.
Roussat
has reservations to mention a date on which the world ends. The four
models he presents, do not point to a common date on which this will
happen. This leads to the conclusion that Roussat has not enough been
able to make it reasonable that the end of the world is near.
Nostradamus:
the millennium model
The millennium model as developed by Nostradamus, is based on biblical
time data, recorded in Genesis, Exodus, 1 Kings and Revelations. He
mentions in his letters to Cesar and Henry II the sixth, seventh and
eighth millennium. Since he does not mention a ninth millennium, the
basic assumption is that he counts with eight millennia, 8.000 years,
for the existence of the world from the beginning until the end.
The
beginning of the first millennium is derived from the Epistle to Henry
II. There it reads that the Old Testament (from Creation until the birth
of Jesus) covers a time span of 4173 years and 8 months. This means that
the birth of Jesus is the turning point in history. His birth is
celebrated on Christmas, December 25. In the investigation on which Nostradamus,
astrology and the Bible is based, his date of birth is
mathematically defined as December 25, 1 BC. In order to calculate the
beginning of the first millennium, i.e. the date of creation of the
world, one has to subtract 4173 years and 8 months from December 25, 1
BC. This results in April 25, 4174 BC. This means that the ending date
of each millennium is April 25. The eighth millennium ends on April 25,
3827.
The
transition of one millennium into another is most of the times not
marked by important events. Exceptions are the beginning of the first
millennium (the creation of the world), the beginning of the eighth
millennium (the beginning of the kingdom of one thousand years) and the
end of the eighth millennium (the Last Judgment and the end of the
world).
Nostradamus writes in his letters to Cesar and Henry II about the
returning rulership of Saturn. In contrast with Roussat, he makes no reservation about this return. In the millennium model, Saturn
rules twice: the first and the last millennium. The other planets (Sun,
Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars and Jupiter) each rule one millennium. This
could be a variation on the model of planetary rulerships as developed
by Ibn Ezra.
According to the millennium model, the world will end on April 25, 3827.
The
investigation on which Nostradamus,
astrology and
the Bible is based,
showed that he used two progression systems in order to predict the
future of the world until its end. Both systems are based on the motion
of the Caput Draconis, but each of them has its own time enlargement
factor.
For the quatrains, Nostradamus uses the CD4-system. In this system, one
degree motion of the Caput Draconis equals 4 years of fulfilment in the
period March 1, 1555 until April 25, 3827. Nostradamus seems to have
applied this system also in the predictions in his Preface to Cesar and
in the first set of predictions in his Epistle to Henry II.
For the second set of predictions in his Epistle to Henry II, Nostradamus
uses the CD100-system. In this system, one degree motion of the Caput
Draconis equals 100 years of fulfilment in the period January 1, 1606
until April 25, 3827.
The CD4- and CD100-system have only the Caput Draconis in common. It is
remarkable that Nostradamus predicts the advancing time with a
factor, the Caput Draconis, which moves backwards with a constant
speed. Although both systems are based on astrology, only the
CD100-system is only based on astrology, which means that Nostradamus
describes the nature of his predictions, the fulfilment time and the
fulfilment place by means of astrology. In the case of the CD4-system,
only the fulfilment time and the fulfilment place are described by means
of astrology. The nature of the predictions is described by the visions
Nostradamus claims to have received from God.
Nostradamus gives from both systems the end date of the progressive
period. The progression period of the CD4-system ends on February 27,
1554. The progression period of the CD100-system ends on February 24,
1607. Both these dates correspond with April 25, 3827, the day on which,
according to Nostradamus, the world will end.
Nostradamus
versus Roussat
A
comparison between Livre de
l'estat... and the millennium model shows that there are no
correspondences between Roussat and Nostradamus, but only differences:
The
number of years of existence of the world
Roussat: around 7.000
years. No mentioning of the kingdom of 1.000 years.
Nostradamus: exactly
8.000 years, including the kingdom of 1.000 years.
The applied number of astrological models
Roussat: four
astrological models.
Nostradamus: one
astrological model.
The date of the beginning of the world
Roussat: 5200 BC, no
date, a chart without date, time or altitude.
Nostradamus: April 25,
4174 BC. No chart.
The date of the end of the world
Roussat: unclear:
some day in 1789, 1814 or perhaps 2241.
Nostradamus: April 25,
3827.
The
applied systems of predictions
Roussat:
two time frames (1750 years and 354 years & 4 months), in
which two transit cycles occur (conjunctions of Jupiter and
Saturn and tenfold rotations of Saturn).
Nostradamus:
one time frame (the millennium model) and two progression
systems, based on the motion of the Caput Draconis. The
quatrains: CD4-system (one degree motion of Caput Draconis
equals 4 years). The second set of predictions in the Epistle to
Henri II:CD100-system (one degree motion of Caput Draconis
equals 100 years). In both systems, the date of the end of the
world is April 25, 3827.
Conclusions
Nostradamus' millennium model is lucid and provides
precise data of the beginning and end of the world. From an arithmetic
point of view, it is a solid model.
The
Epistle to Henry II shows that
Nostradamus dissociated himself from
historical works, written by Marcus Terentius Varro and Eusebius of
Cesarea. In the investigation on which Nostradamus,
astrology and the Bible is
based, it has been concluded that Nostradamus also dissociated himself
from his contemporaries regarding his ideas about the existence of the
world.
Nostradamus
writes to Cesar that the quatrains have a time span until 3797 and that
a number of people will frown their foreheads because of this. The most obvious reason
to have objections against such a time span, is that it is a time span
of more than 2200 years. Contemporaries of Nostradamus had another
reason to object his ideas. The predictions of Nostradamus go far beyond
1801, the year in which the world was supposed to end.
Notes
-
Crouzet,
p.5. [text]
-
The comments of J.P. Brach in Roussat’s Livre
de l’estat et de mutation des temps. [text]
-
Roussat,
p.68. According to Eusebius, there were 2242 years between the Creation
and the deluge, 1017 years between the deluge and Abraham, 430 years
between Abraham and the Exodus, 480 years between the Exodus and the
building of the Temple in Jerusalem, 442 years between the building
of the Temple in Jerusalem and its destruction, and 589 years
between this destruction and the birth of Jesus. [text]
-
Roussat,
p.75. The MC is located on 1 Aries, the Ascendant on 1 Cancer. This
implies a 0-degree latitude. The Sun is located on 19 Aries, which
implies a time of 1h16m before culminating and the date March 30
(leaving calendar corrections aside). The cusps of the other houses are
not according to the Regiomontanus or Campanus systems of house
division. One wonders who had the astrological means in those days to
erect this chart. The chart does not show retrogradation. Retrogradation
of Mercury or Venus cannot be derived from a chart. Mars is located on
28 Scorpio. Because of its distance from the Sun, Mars is retrograde
(but not discussed by Roussat as being retrograde). Jupiter and Saturn
are direct, because of their distance from the Sun. Saturn is located on
21 Aquarius. [text]
-
Roussat,
p.83. He does not discuss the beginning or the end of the biblical
kingdom of 1.000 years. [text]
-
Roussat,
p.139-140. See also Brind’Amour, p.35-36, note 85. [text]
-
Roussat,
p.63. [text]
-
Roussat,
p.162 and the comments of Brach. The time spans in the third and fourth
period are average time spans. Present-day astrological software shows
that these calculations are off. In the chart of creation of the world,
Saturn was located on 21 Aquarius. Around mid-February 1787, Saturn was
again located on 21 Aquarius, completing its rotation. In 1789, Saturn
was moving from 7 Pisces to 19 Pisces and Jupiter was moving from Cancer
to Virgo. There was no magnificent conjunction in 1789. Jupiter and
Saturn were conjunct in November 1782 on 28 Sagittarius. So one wonders
which chart served Albumasar in the 9th century to predict
“the great troubles for the exact date in 1789” as Brach writes in
his comments in Livre de
l’estat…
As for the year 1814: if the world is supposed to be created in
5200 BC and the existence is 7.000 years, the end will take place some
day in 1801, not in 1814. [text]
-
Roussat,
p.139-140. [text]
-
Roussat,
p.95. [text]
-
If
the assumption is correct that the date of the chart of creation of the
world is March 30, 5200 BC, the end is on March 30, 1801, according to
the Julian calendar. To this date, ten days must be added in order to
get the Gregorian date of April 9, 1801. [text]
Related
publication: The
millennium model versus the Trithemian cycle
CRITICIZED BY COLLEAGUES (NOSTRADAMUS VERSUS VIDEL)
|
Judicial
warning against inept critics
Let those who read these verses, consider them profoundly
Let the profane and ignorant herd keep away
And far away all Astrologers, Idiots and Barbarians
May he who does otherwise be subject to the sacred rite.
Preface
to Cesar
...these predictions run from today until the year 3797 - maybe
some will frown their foreheads if they see this long time span...
|
During
his life, Nostradamus was criticized and attacked because of his practice
of astrology. He was not only attacked by the Ministry of Justice. Some of
his colleagues criticized him also. In 1558, his colleague Laurens Videl published
a book, entitled Declaration des
abus, ignorances et seditions de Michel
Nostradamus. In this
book, he criticized in full detail almost the complete oeuvre of Nostradamus.
Videl discusses a number of topics, such as:
-
In
the Pronostications,
Nostradamus uses wrong positions of the Sun while explaining
quartercharts.
-
In
the Pronostications,
Nostradamus specifies time moments on which planetary
positions occur, in a strange way.
-
In
the Pronostications
and Almanachs,
Nostradamus lists wrong positions of Sun and Moon in the case of
lunar phases.
-
In
the Pronostications,
Nostradamus makes mistakes in determining extraordinary
astrological circumstances, e.g. "combust".
-
Nostradamus
makes mistakes when determining astrological aspects.
-
In
the Prophecies,
Nostradamus writes about the end of the world, about which he
simply can not know anything at all.
-
In
the Prophecies,
the claim of Nostradamus that he has received the gift of
prophecy, is unjust.
-
In
the Prophecies,
Nostradamus uses incorrect the rulership of Mars over the period
1179-1533 according to the astrological time model of Ibn Ezra.
The
remarks of Videl will be discussed step by
step.
 |
Laurent
Videl
DECLARATION DES ABUS IGNORANCES ET SEDITIONS DE MICHEL NOSTRADAMUS
Quartercharts
Quartercharts (ingresscharts) are charts, erected for the
entrance (ingress) of the Sun in one of the cardinal signs (Aries,
Cancer, Libra or Capricorn). Usually, also in Nostradamus' time, these
charts are erected for the exact moment on which the Sun is located on
0:00:00 in one of these signs. According to Nostradamus, in these
quartercharts the Sun is further in the first degree. Videl thinks that
Nostradamus copied the zodiacal longitudes of the Sun from ephemeredes,
calculated for Venice, 12:00 local time. [1]
The
true local time for Salon-de-Provence for a solar ingress can not be
copied from ephemeris data. An astrologer always has to calculate such
time moments by himself. Videl doubts if Nostradamus knows how to do
this.
In our era, most ephemeredes are calculated for midnight G.M.T.
(Greenwich Mean Time). This means that the local time of the chart has
to be converted to G.M.T., in order to calculate the Mean Sidereal Time
and the zodiacal longitude of the planets and the Mean Lunar Node.
In Nostradamus' lifetime, there were ephemeredes calculated for 12:00:00
true local time for e.g. Paris and Venice. The
eastern longitude coordinate of Salon-de-Provence is 5:06:00. The
eastern longitude of Paris is 2:20:00. The true local time difference
between Salon-de-Provence and Paris is 0:08:45. When local time in Paris
is 12:00:00, local time in Salon-de-Provence is 12:08:45. The eastern
longitude coordinate of Venice is 12:21:00. This means that the true
local time difference between Salon-de-Provence and Venice is
0:29:00. When local time Venice is 12:00:00, local time in
Salon-de-Provence is 11:31:00.
It is this phenomenon which is discussed by Videl. If one erects a
horoscope for Salon-de-Provence with ephemeris data based on Venice,
without converting true local time of Salon-de-Provence to true local
time of Venice, the result is wrong. The house cusps will have a
negative deviation in zodiacal longitude of about 7:30:00 and the Moon
will have a negative deviation of averagely 0:14:30.
In the investigation on which Nostradamus,
astrology and the Bible
is based, the quartercharts were recalculated. This showed that the
quartercharts indeed were calculated for 12:00:00 true local time,
Salon-de-Provence. The recalculations did not show which ephemeris
Nostradamus used, because Nostradamus does not mention the zodiacal
longitude of the house cusps. If these longitudes were known, one could
easily derive the coordinates of the city that is involved.
A comparison has been made between the zodiacal longitude of Sun and
Moon, given by Nostradamus, calculated for Salon-de-Provence, and the
ones, calculated with present-day software for Venice (all longitudes
for 12:00:00 true local time). [2]
In the case of June 12 and September 14, 1557, the zodiacal longitude of
the Sun,
calculated by Nostradamus, is less than the zodiacal longitude,
calculated for Venice. In the case of the Moon, a lesser zodiacal
longitude is shown for June 12 and December 12, and in the latter case
this difference is 0:15:02. One can see that the deviation between
zodiacal longitudes, given by Nostradamus, and zodiacal longitudes,
calculated with present-day software, does not reveal anything about
which ephemeris Nostradamus used.
Videl most likely compared the zodiacal longitudes, given by
Nostradamus, with noon zodiacal longitudes, as listed in various
ephemeredes. His conclusion was crystal clear and his criticism is
justified.
|
1557
|
Sun
(Nostradamus) |
Sun
(software) |
Moon
(Nostradamus) |
Moon
(software) |
|
11-03-1557 |
00:53:00
Ar |
00:31:03
Ar |
not
given |
16:03:40
Le |
|
12-06-1557 |
00:25:09
Cn |
00:26:18
Cn |
05:18:00
Ca |
05:23:00
Ca |
|
14-09-1557 |
00:55:00
Li |
00:57:47
Li |
15:17:00
Ge |
15:03:21
Ge |
|
12-12-1557 |
00:44:00
Ca |
00:27:27
Ca |
25:43:00
Vi |
25:58:02
Vi |
Specifying
hours and minutes
In Nostradamus' lifetime, it was usual to specify time moments in
A.M. and P.M. (before and after 12:00:00). In his lifetime, the ephemeredes
were calculated for 12:00:00 true local time. This means that a day in
the ephemeris runs from 12:00:00 until 12:00:00.
Videl criticizes the fact that Nostradamus for example specifies March 1,
1557, 03:47:00, as February 28, 1557, 15:47:00. [3]
This
kind of specification is strange at first sight, unless one realizes that this might
serve as a means of aid for correct interpolation. The zodiacal
longitudes are given per 24 hours. The way Nostradamus specifies time
moments, means that he relates them to 12:00:00. In the case of this
example, there are 15 hours and 47 minutes gone by, counting from February 28, 1557, 12:00:00.
Erroneous
zodiacal longitudes
Videl strongly
doubts the mathematical skills of Nostradamus. Zodiacal
longitudes are not always correct. This was also seen in the
recalculations. This is a serious point. If astrological explanations
are based on wrong calculations or mistakes in the chart, the
explanation is irrevocably wrong.
The
possibility of printer's errors should always be kept in mind. One of
the most peculiar printer's errors can be found in the introduction to the
predictions for spring 1558. In the first line it reads that on March
11, 1558, the date of the quarterchart for spring 1558, the zodiacal
longitude of the Moon is 16:40 Leo. Software data show that
the Moon's zodiacal longitude is 24:56 Sagittarius. The given zodiacal
longitude of the Moon in Leo occurred on March 11, 1557, the date of the
quarterchart for spring 1557. (recalculations showed that this longitude
was 16:20:01 Leo for 12:00:00 true local time, Salon-de-Provence). A
possible explanation for this error might be that Jean Brotot, a Lyonese
publisher, announced in September 1557 that from the two received Pronostications
he wanted to print one completely, while adding material from the other
one. In his letter, he did not mention which Pronostications were at
stake. They could have been the ones from 1557 and 1558.[4]
The
meaning of "combust"
Videl criticizes the remark of Nostradamus that in the summer of 1557,
Saturn in Taurus is "combust" while the Sun is in Cancer.
[5]
In fact, in
two
quartercharts, for the summer and winter of 1557, Nostradamus mentions
that Saturn is combust.
[6]
The
word "combust" means that a planet, with the exception of the
Moon, is within 3 - 8 degrees from the Sun. If the distance is less than
3 degrees of arc, such a conjunction is called a "cazimi"
conjunction. Videl seems to have a point
here. Recalculations however show that according to Nostradamus, the
word "combust" means that a planet and the Caput Draconis
(North Lunar Node) are in the same sign. In the recalculated quartercharts for
summer and winter of 1557, both Saturn and the Caput Draconis are
located in Taurus.
The
word "combust" shows also up in quatrain 04-67:
|
Quatrain
04-67
The year in which Saturn and Mars are combust equally,
The air very dry parched long meteor:
By secret fires a great place blazing from burning heat,
Little rain, warm wind, wars, incursions.
|
The
use of the word "combust" means that Saturn, Mars and the
Caput Draconis are in the same zodiacal sign. In the period in which
Nostradamus was supposed to have visions, this occurred only once:
around February 8, 1546. On that date, Mars, Saturn and the Caput
Draconis were conjunct on the 24th degree of Sagittarius. According to
the CD4-system, this quatrain will be fulfilled around February 12,
3204. [7]
The
determination of aspects
Videl
mentions an opposition between Taurus and Libra as an example of
determining aspects wrongly.
[8]
Recalculation did not show
which opposition was at stake. Theoretically, this could be an
opposition between the last degrees of Libra and the first degrees of
Taurus.
Nostradamus
as a prophet
Videl sharply criticizes the Prophecies,
as far as they were published in his time.
[9]
He criticizes the mentioning
of the year 3797, because even the angels don't know anything about the
end of times. [10]
Videl uses a number of Bible verses in order to
demonstrate that Nostradamus is not a prophet in biblical sense, but an
imposter:
-
1
Samuel 9,9: the one who is called prophet nowadays, was
called voyant in earlier days.
-
1
Kings 22,14: the prophet Michajehu, who only says what God
wants him to say. Videl writes that Nostradamus belongs to the
400 prophets who do not obey God.
-
2
Kings 5,8: Elisa is called: the Man of God.
-
Matthew
7,15: Videl writes that Jesus warns against false prophets
such as Nostradamus.
-
Romans
12,6: gifts are given; if you have received the gift of
prophecy, use it according to your faith.
-
Ephesians
4,11-12: God gave gifts [among which the gift of prophecy]
in order to fit out the saints for their service and in order to
build the "body of Christ".
Videl
is opposing the Prophecies
for several reasons. One of them is that no star or planet wants
humanity to invent a new kind of astrology, based on drunken fury. [11]
Another reason seems to be that Nostradamus, because of the nature of
his Prophecies, passes
beyond the limits of astrology. [12]
It is understandable why Videl fulminates against the prophetic
dimensions of Nostradamus. In the investigation on which Nostradamus
astrology and the Bible is
based, it became clear that the many quotations in the Preface to Cesar from
a section in the
Mirabilis Liber
which contains the Compendium
Revelationum by
Savonarola, form a theory about how revelations happen.
Nostradamus
and the astrological time model of Ibn Ezra
Videl
does not criticize astrological remarks in the quatrains. He criticizes
a fragment in the Preface to Cesar, in which Nostradamus writes about
Mars, in the light of other fragments which deal with rulerships of the
Moon, the Sun and Saturn:
|
Preface
to Cesar
...This will occur short before the last conflagration,
for although the planet Mars will finish its cycle, at the end
of its last period, it will start again...
...While we
are now lead by the Moon [...] the Sun will come and then
Saturn. For according to the signs in the heavens, the reign of
Saturn will return... |
According
to an astrological time model of Abraham Ibn Ezra, Mars ruled from 1179
until 1533, and the Moon from 1533 until 1887. Next, there would be a
rulership of the Sun until 2241, next there might be a rulership of
Saturn. It the Preface to Cesar, the French text reads ...Mars
parachève son siècle, et à la fin de son dernier période, si le
reprendra il... Videl interpreted this as a reference to the
rulership of Mars over the period 1179-1533. Due to this interpretation,
he rejected the suggestion that Mars immediately would renew his
rulership, especially since Nostradamus stated that humanity now (i.e.
March 1, 1555, the date of his Preface to Cesar) is ruled by the Moon and
since he writes about the Sun and Saturn as successive rulers. Videl
concludes that Nostradamus does not understand anything about the
astrological model of Ibn Ezra.
In the investigation on which Nostradamus
astrology and the Bible is
based, the first quotation, in which Nostradamus discusses Mars, was
interpreted differently. The words "last conflagration" were
interpreted as "last conjunction of a planet with the Sun",
which is usually named "combust". Hence, the "cycle"
of Mars is not a rulership, but a rotation in the Zodiac. Nostradamus
describes a situation in which Mars is in Pisces, the last sign of the
Zodiac, heading for Aries, i.e. not being retrograde. There is a
conflagration, i.e. a conjunction of a planet with the Sun. This
conflagration is the last conflagration, which means that there are no
planets between the Sun and the last degree of Pisces. This all took
place on February 27, 1554, with the Caput Draconis on 18 Cancer,
Jupiter on 2 Libra retrograde, the Moon on 26 Capricorn, Mercury on 23
Aquarius, Venus on 29 Aquarius, Mars on 16 Pisces and Saturn and the Sun
on 19 Pisces. The words "last conflagration" point to a
Sun/Saturn conjunction in Pisces, the last sign of the Zodiac, after
which there will not be another conflagration in Pisces.
The words "last conflagration" were also related
to the Last Judgment and the death by fire as described in Revelations
20,15. This death by fire is the last death of that kind in the Bible.
Next, in Revelations 21,1, the new heaven and new earth are described.
With the words "last conflagration", Nostradamus points to a
burning in astrological and biblical sense. In astrological sense, there
is an end date of an astrological model he uses, which corresponds with
the date on which the world will come to an end. This means that he uses
a progression system.
The Preface to Cesar shows that Nostradamus counts with eight millennia
and that the quatrains cover a time span until 3797. But a date on which
the world has been created or will come to an end, is not given in the
Preface to Cesar. The date on which the world has been created, according
to Nostradamus, can be derived from the Epistle to Henry II: 4173 years
and 8 months before the birth of Jesus Christ, i.e. April 25, 4174 BC.
Adding 8000 years results in April 25, 3827, being the date on which the
world will come to an end, according to Nostradamus. But at the time
Videl published his Déclaration
d'abus... the Epistle to Henry II was not yet published. [13]
Conclusion
Videl
writes, whether or not sneering, about the "new astrology"
Nostradamus would hold in favour. His technical criticism is most of the
time justified. From a religious point of view, one can understand his
resentments against and doubts about the prophetic dimension of the Prophecies.
However, it is also clear that Nostradamus indeed develops his own kind
of astrology, sometimes diametrically opposed to current ideas, and, in
the case of Videl, overlooked or misunderstood.
T.W.M.
van Berkel
Notes
-
Videl, section B1.
[text]
-
Chevignard,
p.401-411. The present-day software: AstroScoop Plus. [text]
-
Videl, section B3.
[text]
-
Chevignard,
p.426, Dupèbe, p.31. [text]
-
Videl,
section B4. [text]
-
Chevignard,
p.404 and 411. [text]
-
In
my book Nostradamus,
astrology and the Bible,
the first line of this quatrain was interpreted as a close
conjunction of Mars/Saturn on the 27th degree of Aquarius and
the Sun on the 16th degree of Pisces on February 25, 1552 (Van
Berkel, p.19). At the time of printing, I did not realize the
meaning Nostradamus gave to the word "combust". This
Mars/Saturn conjunction is almost exact in opposition with the
Caput Draconis, but there is no evidence that in such a case
Nostradamus would speak of a "combust" situation. [text]
-
Videl,
section B4. [text]
-
Videl,
section D4. Videl finished his book on November 21, 1557. He
might have read the 1557-DuRosne-edition, which was printed on
November 3, 1557 (Chomarat/Laroche, p.23). He might also have
read the 1555-Bonhomme-edition, which was printed in 1555. [text]
-
Videl,
section E1. He refers to Matthew 24,35-36 and/or Marc 13,32. [text]
-
Videl,
section D4. [text]
-
Videl,
section F. [text]
-
The
model of Ibn Ezra is described in the section which deals with Roussat.
A description of the progression systems, used by Nostradamus,
can be found in the page prediction
systems.
text]
NOSTRADAMUS AND HUMANISM
|
Quatrain
01-48
Twenty years of the reign of the Moon have passed
Seven thousand years another will hold his monarchy
When the Sun will reach its tired days
Then my prophecy is accomplished and finished
Preface
to Cesar
...and the all-controlling movement, which renders the
earth stable and fixed... |
The
Renaissance is a cultural movement, which originated in the 14th century
in Italy. In Nostradamus' lifetime, the Renaissance also flourished in
France.
A number of investigators characterizes Nostradamus as a humanist.
In the investigation on which Nostradamus,
astrology and the Bible
is based, his message to humanity has become clear. The nature of this
message permits us to have a look at the nature of the ideas of
Nostradamus about humanity, God, heaven and earth.
In the investigation, humanism is defined as a movement which supposes that man is
the standard of all things. This does not necessarily mean that
humanists are atheists. But it means that the main interest of humanism
is man, humanity, not something or someone outside. The "memento
mori" (remind to die) of the Middle Ages is replaced by a discovery
of the values of mankind, with roots in the Classic Greec and Roman
era.
The message Nostradamus wants to share with humanity is that between 1555 and 3797, God will execute his judgment
over humanity by means of one thousand irrevocable, disastrous events. This
is diametrically opposed to the ideas of humanism. His ideas are dualistic and theocratic. This is shown in
his letters and in quatrain 01-48. In this quatrain, Nostradamus
describes the reign of Satan for 7000 years. During the existence of the world,
there is a war going on between God and Satan, according to Nostradamus.
A war which at first, at the beginning of the first millennium, develops
in favor of Satan (the eternal sin). At the beginning of the eighth
millennium, God seizes power by means of the kingdom of one thousand
years. During the last 30 years of the eighth millennium, the last war
between Satan and the heavenly armies takes place. In that war, Satan
gets the worst out of it. Heaven and earth vanish and there will be a new heaven and a
new earth.
The
quotation from the Preface to Cesar is a reference to Psalm 104,5, which
reads: "Thou founded the earth on her pillars, immovable, lasting
forever". This means that Nostradamus favours the geocentric view,
in which the earth is the center of the universe, around which all the
planets rotate. There is no evidence in the letters or the quatrains
that he sympathized with the heliocentric ideas, as developed by
Copernicus.
|